Intranet evolution, best practices, and case studies by Toby Ward.

Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online Blog Flux Directory
Subscribe with myFeedster
This Month
July 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Web Development & Design Blogs - Blog Top Sites © 2006 Prescient Digital Media. All rights reserved. www.PrescientDigital.com
View Article  Intranet migration basics

(TORONTO, ON) It seems that nearly every company I talk to is in some form of “intranet redesign” -which could be a complete overhaul, a design tweak or something in the middle that might include a new technology platform such as a portal or content management system.

 

One facet of the redesign (by the way I hate that term “redesign” because of course it emphasizes look-and-feel which completely understates the main value and intent of a complex business system – but since its part of our modern vernacular…) that is often overlooked until a problem occurs, is the migration process from old to new. Migration involves a lot… from content to applications to platform. A lot can go wrong with migration.

 

Paul Chin offers some sage advice in Move It on Over: Intranet Migration Basics on Intranet Journal (no, this is not one of their now all-too-common product announcement or advertorial articles).

 

Paul’s article summarizes some of the key technical considerations of migration including:

  • Component migration
  • Multiple environments
  • Working with users
  • Post-production safety measures
  • Rollback measures
  • Post-production support

One key thing that is rarely or thoroughly accounted for in the initial plan is the time required for migrating content. If your intranet has thousands or tens-of-thousands of pages or more then full content migration likely will take weeks if not months. It’s not uncommon for some content migration to be phased over a couple of years. Deploying a platform such as a CMS that has ‘batch’ importing capabilities will certainly help, but all content should be reviewed, updated, edited or deleted prior to a migration – and this requires a lot of human effort.

 

The process of updating or deleting content begins with a content audit – which should be done long before the implementation of a new technology platform. One client at a 750 person company used two summer students armed with a browser and an MS-Excel spreadsheet to track and document all 10,000 pages on their intranet. It took them one month and a half to review and document all 10,000 pages (about 3,000 pages per auditor per month). The good news was they identified all the content and found that only 4,000 of the 10,000 pages were of any value. In one full swoop they wiped out 6,000 pages which saved them a lot of server space and maintenance costs not to mention helped preserve business continuity and accuracy of information.

 

For more information on content audits, read Auditing your 'king'.

 

Here’s the key point: a redesign is a face-lift of the look-and-feel, a perfect project for a design agency or PR firm. What most of those design agencies or PR firms have little experience or knowledge of is measures like rollback plans and content audits. Intranet migration to a new site and/or platform (usually one in the same) requires a lot of thought and planning, and an intense commitment to detail and process.

 

Read the full article, Move It on Over: Intranet Migration Basics.

View Article  The open source revolution

Most of our fellow web heads use Internet Explorer to browse the net. However, more and more are using Firefox, the free open source platform. In fact, there have been almost 200 million downloads to date. In Germany, 45% of web users use Firefox.

 

IBM has embraced open source with both arms. Red Hat is a billion-dollar company that focuses solely on open source integration and implementation (namely the Linus operating system). With $300M in annual revenue and a profit margin of nearly 27%, Red Hat has proven the financial viability of riding the open source train.

 

One company watching the open source content management and intranet sector closely is Optaros. An Optaros survey released last Christmas highlights the potential value of using Open Source.

 

The study was conducted in August and September 2005 with responses from 512 U.S. companies, government agencies and other organizations. The study found that the clear majority of organizations (87%) were using open source systems, software often available for free and built by communities of software developers. The most frequently-used open source software was the Linux operating system, the Apache web server, and web browsers, used at some level by more than 70% of the companies represented by the survey participants. About half the respondents were using open source database management systems and application servers in a single business function.

 

Sampled companies ranged in size from small organizations with revenue under $50 million to large organizations with revenues over $1 billion. The move to open source software is in part explained by the cost savings that companies are generating. Organizations with annual revenue of more than $1 billion saved an average $3.3 million in 2004 from their open source software. Medium-sized companies (with revenues between $50 million and $1 billion) saved an average $1.1 million, and companies less than $50 million saved about $500,000. Several survey respondents reported substantial savings: a technology company cut costs by $20 million, and four companies (three of them telecommunications firms) each saved $10 million last year.

 

Gaining in popularity are open source business applications software such as portals and content management systems. Some 42% of the survey participants had open source portals and content management systems that supported a single function. Some 16% used open source customer relationship management systems, a percentage that will double in the next three years.

 

Open source content management is becoming hot. Seth Gottlieb is the Content Management and Collaboration Lead at Optaros and he’s watching the enterprise and intranet space closely.

 

Some of the open source solutions that Seth watches include:

 

  • Brocalage
  • OpenCMS
  • Magnolia
  • CPS
  • Alfresco
  • Joomla
  • Typo3

However, Plone is Seth’s favorite. “I particularly like the (Plone) founder’s approach of “less is more, ” says Gottlieb, speaking this week to the team at Prescient Digital Media. “Plone has a very user-friendly interface as well as a plug-in architecture for adding on other applications.”

 

The one detraction to Plone, Gottlieb notes, is using Plone as an architecture for building new applications. A problem he likens to Lotus Notes application development.

 

A couple of other findings from the Optaros study:

 

  • The study found that once organizations start using open source software, their usage typically increases.
  • Most companies were confronted by four primary barriers to achieving even greater benefits:

·         Uncertainties about open source software that often relegate the software to the IT function

·         Lack of understanding of licensing and legal issues around open source software

·         Software cost allocation policies that discourage business functions from reducing the cost of commercial software

·         The difficulty of identifying, evaluating, purchasing and maintaining open source software

 

Are you using open source? Why not?

 

RELATED READING:

The growing popularity of open source intranets

Open source solutions for Lotus intranets

Open source intranets

Sex, Lies, and CMS Vendors

 

© 2006 Toby Ward - Prescient Digital Media