Social media and intranet case studies, best practices, & evolution by Toby Ward.
View Article  World’s largest mashup on ECM

Bill Ives brought to my attention ECMHUB 2.0 “described as the world's largest mashup focusing on the ECM and KM industries and married it to web collaboration.”

While Tony Byrne and CMSWatch.com are good places to start for intelligence on enterprise content management (ECM), Ives explains the size and importance of ECMHUB 2.0 is:


”First they created a generic Yahoo Pipe that reads Google Spreadsheet information that lists hundreds of ECM industry RSS feeds including blogs, news, webcasts, questions, RFPs, and videos. Then they take the feeds and caches them into Google. Using Google App Engine they built an "on demand" feed caching and refresh application. This means the latest articles are instantly retrievable within only a few seconds and the individual feeds are automatically rebuilt with a push of a button. They then built "cloud communities" around the feeds adding comments, ratings, web conferencing, and 3D chat. Currently, they have support for over 40 communities with over 5,000 daily articles. Finally they wrap the entire application using Javascript with an AJAX foundation. The site says that "this means instead of navigating from page to page like a traditional website, you navigate by retrieving web page data on demand. When you click on a community, for instance, the main page area will clear and show an animated star indicating that new data, such as the latest news, is currently loading."

 

Many people are still confuse about ECM and whether or not they need it. My presentation 2 weeks ago on CMS Trends Traps & Tips 2008 provides a decent summary and explanation (follow the link to the presentation on SlideShare.net)

 

Also Read Jed Cawthorne’s full article and comparison tables on CMS or ECM - What is the difference?

 

RELATED READING:

Buying or moving to a new CMS? Be very careful…

Analyzing Enterprise 2.0 software

 

BOOKMARK THIS:

 Digg this     Post to del.icio.us     Post to Slashdot     reddit     

Facebook     StumbleUpon    Add to Technorati Faves

 
View Article  Gartner’s magic quadrant for intranet portals

Only 12 enterprise portal vendors remain on Gartner’s latest magic quadrant for “horizontal portal products.”

 

The only changes are the subtraction of BEA, now part of Oracle, and the addition of Covisint and RedHat (though lest they be seen as ‘prescient’ I had included them in my Portal magic quadrant two years ago!). Also added to this year’s quadrant is the one to really watch: Liferay.



 

Some of Gartner’s findings include (most of which I highlighted two years ago):

 

  • Mashups, lightweight composite applications based on Web-oriented architectures (WOAs), could emerge as alternatives to horizontal portal frameworks for creating enterprise Web environments
  • Increased interest in Web 2.0
  • By 2011, Gartner expects at least 10% of new enterprise portal projects in the Global 2000 to use open-source horizontal portal frameworks

 

Frankly, I’m surprised more organizations are not using portals. The Intranet 2.0 study reveals that only 10% of respondents (some 230 respondent organizations thus far) use a portal product to power their intranet. However, these solutions are complex, and pricey.

 

I will not be doing an update of the Prescient Portal magic quadrant just yet: there haven’t been enough significant changes… the only one is to remove BEA’s label under Oracle.

 

I do however note the following trends:

 

  • Gartner is spot on: open-source will become more and more popular
  • Liferay is the challenger to watch (Gartner thinks its RedHat)
  • Plone could well find its way onto the quadrant but Python holds it back
  • IBM is the portal leader and champion
  • Microsoft SharePoint (MOSS 2007) is the darling
  • Product consolidation is largely over as IBM, Oracle and Microsoft will own 95% of the total money put into portal solutions (but Vignette won’t last much longer and will be bought)
  • Usability and price will be the principal weaknesses that scare buyers
  • Web 2.0 functionality will continue to grow but not be a primary consideration for buyers

 

RELATED READING:

The Intranet Portal Blueprint

Pros and cons for enterprise intranet portals

Another portal bites the dust


ALSO:

Don’t forget: you cannot get the full results of the Intranet 2.0 study without taking the survey.  Please take 10 minutes to take the Intranet 2.0 Global Survey and you’ll get a copy of the full results including the good, bad and learned lessons – ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT TO PARTICIPATE IF YOU DON’T HAVE INTRANET 2.0 TOOLS.


BOOKMARK THIS:

 Digg this     Post to del.icio.us     Post to Slashdot     reddit     

Facebook     StumbleUpon    Add to Technorati Faves

 


Search
    follow me on Twitter