(SAN JOSE, CA) While an innovative
intranet may be cool, and look great, a truly innovative intranet
delivers true value and advances an organization's standing in its
industry.
Intranet Innovation
Award winner, SabreTown (Sabre's social networking for employees)
Winning entries
include intranets from all over the World including:
CRS Australia
(Australia)
IDEO (USA), IBM
(USA)
SunGard
(USA/NZ)
NYK Group (UK)
Sabre (USA)
COWI (Denmark)
ChTPZ (Russia)
Prophet (USA)
AEP (USA).
The Intranet
Innovations Awards celebrate new ideas and innovative approaches
to the enhancement and delivery of intranets.Now in their third year,
the awards have uncovered many innovative ideas from across the
globe. Use these ideas to gain senior management support and to
deliver an ever-better intranet.
For
example, AEP, a US-based electric utility have created an
online ideas system that has identified $8 million in savings, $2
million in the first month alone.
With winners across
four categories (core functionality, communication and collaboration,
frontline delivery and business solutions), there are valuable ideas
for every intranet team.
The 198-page
Intranet
Innovations 2009 report shares the full results of the awards,
including screenshots and details of the winning entries.
As is the
case with most websites or intranets it is simply impossible to achieve any
long-lasting success without a clearly defined ownership and management
structure. Intranet governance provides clarity and rules: namely the titles,
roles and responsibilities of its owners, managers, stakeholders and
contributors. However, at the heart of a successful model, is a powerful
executive with purse strings, supported by a solid intranet team.
Here are
some of the most frequently asked questions regarding governance and a
successful intranet, culled from the Q&A of my webinar on Intranet
Governance (the highest attended webinar to date) last month:
Q- How do you define what a great intranet is?
A – A great intranet:
operates from a thorough, well defined plan;
is managed by a rigorous governance model supported by a powerful
senior executive and a solid management team;
has a reasonable budget for both technical and content development;
features solid, purposeful content and tools that actively support
the day-to-day work of employees; and
delivers a solid return on investment in the form of cost savings /
cost avoidance and increased sales.
Q - What is the governance model that fits companies
who have made the move to social media on their intranet?
A – Governance depends on the culture, company and the
management and stakeholders involved. Social media MUST have governance though it
should fall under the central intranet governance unless the social media tools
are purely separate and owned separately from the intranet / portal home.
A successful social media governance model requires:
A defined owner with clout
Defined roles & responsibilities for all
Policies (rules) for contributing content
Terms of use
Q - Can you talk to setting up a steering committee in
more detail, especially when all stakeholders feel that it is their intranet?
A – Follow a proper intranet
assessment to ensure that all key intranet stakeholders (managers and
executives with a full, partial or perceived ownership stake in the intranet or
its major sections and tools) have a formal opportunity to provide input and to
itemize their key requirements. From assessment you move into intranet
planning that actively engages these key stakeholders and culminates in the
development of one of four key intranet governance models that all (or at least
most) agree to adopt for their own.
They key is building consensus. If the stakeholder
environment is particularly fractured and not given to teamwork, or have
competing priorities, then a third-party, non-partisan can help facilitate the
process and break down the political barriers.
Q - Is there a template for comprehensive Governance
Planning?
A - We do not have a free template because that is
actually a service that we provide, and each organization is different and unique
and requires their own governance model. While there are four distinct types of
governance models (see Intranet
Governance: Ownership, Management & Policy)we (Prescient Digital Media) has never created the exact same
governance model twice. If you do not have experience with intranet governance
models then you may benefit from hiring an outside intranet
consultant to assist with the process.
Q - I feel that I own the intranet because I started
it by myself 3 years ago, but I’m not sure how to set up a real steering
committee.
A – If people don’t feel that you own it then you will
be challenged or replaced as the owner – you need to get an executive champion (someone
in senior management, preferably the C-suite). If you are being challenged for
the ownership of the intranet, then you most definitely need to hire an
external intranet
consultant or expert to help you navigate these politics.
Q - How are policies and standards enforced? How do
you make people respond to a new initiative?
A – Use a combination of the carrot and the stick:
reward participants, and punish the non-conformists. If the intranet is a good
one, with centralized technology and content management then the intranet
should sell itself (and would undoubtedly be less expensive for other groups to
use as their platform then maintaining and operating their own). However, if
they move to the central system, they have to sign-off on the governance (which
is also baked into the CMS or portal). For those that won’t cooperate, then
don’t link to their site, ensure the search engine doesn’t index them, and
don’t let them use the root intranet URL (this effectively banishes them to a
corner of the corporate universe that isn’t easily found without the exact
URL).
About the
author: Toby Ward is an intranet consultant (Internet consultant too) and the
founder of Prescient Digital Media.
He has worked with and improved many, many company intranets including Amgen,
HSBC, Mastercard, Manulife, PepsiCo, Royal Bank, etc. Toby and his company are
consultants for hire and can build your intranet or improve an existing
intranet You may contact
this intranet consultant directly via the Prescient Digital Media website
or email him at: toby{at}prescientdigital{dot}com.
In many ways, websites and intranets are like telephone systems – they assist us in accomplishing mission-critical work all the time but their true value is rarely measured.
Most people and organizations inherently know and understand the value of the telephone and don’t require a detailed ROI balance sheet before buying a phone. Like the telephone, most organizations inherently understand the value of an intranet, but don’t truly measure its value beyond HITS.
Failure to measure your intranet’s performance above and beyond simple analytics (e.g. HITS and page views) is a failure of responsibility (particularly in this economy where most organizations are looking cut costs wherever they find them).
Here are five noteworthy key performance indicators (KPIs) that you need to adopt:
Sales – if you’re intranet is not helping your organization increase sales, then you’re missing out. It’s far too easy to accomplish with a little planning and execution. Among the benefits:
Provide the sales team with better information, more efficiently
User satisfaction – more important than what employees are reading, and how often / much, is their satisfaction with the intranet. How happy are they? In particular, user satisfaction with:
43% extremely/very satisfied the BT Homepage (down 5%)
3% dissatisfied with BT Homepage (no change)
Productivity – the intranet can significantly boost employee productivity and their ability to find information and tools to complete their work. Among the productivity metrics that Microsoft, IBM and BT track:
33% of Microsoft employee survey participants (33%) agree completely that the Microsoft intranet (MSWeb) saves them time
27% agree completely that MSWeb has helped to improve their productivity (8 or 9 on a nine-point scale)
80% IBM employees visit w3 (the intranet) at least once per day
68% view the intranet as crucial to their jobs
52% are more satisfied to be an IBM employee because of information obtained on w3
48% agree the BT Intranet improves everyday working life
57% agree the BT Intranet saves me time in my working day
59% agree the BT Intranet helps me to be more efficient in my job
Stakeholder satisfaction – a far more critical and discerning audience are those managers and executives (stakeholders) that have a hand in or ownership of the intranet. Our intranet consultants (Prescient Digital Media) have solicited and surveyed stakeholders for their opinions and ratings of the for more than 100 intranet clients. Why? It’s not just about making users happy, but also making management happy.
Cost savings – why have an intranet if it’s not saving your organization money? Improved communications and HR are nice, soft benefits, but if the intranet is delivering those benefits, then it’s probably delivering cost savings that you just haven’t measured. Everything from paper, software, technology, administration, distribution / delivery, and travel costs to just about anything under the sun. There are hundreds of areas to save money with your intranet.
Who
should own the intranet? Communications? IT? HR? All of them? You may be
shocked to learn that many companies don’t know the answer; in fact, many
organizations can’t clearly answer with any confidence whom is the present
intranet owner.
As is the
case with most intranets it is simply impossible to achieve any long-lasting
success without a clearly defined ownership and management structure. Far from
being a buzz word or jargon, intranet governance provides clarity and rules:
namely the titles, roles and responsibilities of its owners, managers,
stakeholders and contributors.
Sample governance model – large-sized
financial services firm
(Source: Prescient Digital Media)
Simply
put, governance defines an intranet’s ownership and management model and
structure including the:
Management team
Roles & responsibilities
of contributors
Decision making process
Policies & standards
Like the
content of your website or intranet, planning and governance is technology
agnostic; whether it’s SharePoint, IBM or another portal or content management system,
the necessity for and the approach to governance is the same. Given its
technology neutral status in governance is largely applicable to any technology
platform.
POLITICS
Politics
and the issues of control, ownership and standards go hand-in-hand with
intranet management and perhaps these issues, more than any other, have driven
the requirement for planning and defined governance models. Sadly, very few
organizations actually have a well-defined governance model, and many of those
have spent hundreds-of-thousands to millions of dollars on their website or
intranet – amounting to extraordinary investments left to chance and execution
on a whim.
Only 47% of organizations
have a defined governance model (32% have 6,000 employees or more; 11%
have 30,000 employees or more);
Of the tools and platforms
being used by survey participants, a whopping 47% are using SharePoint
(MOSS 2007) in some shape or form.
Politics
will kill your intranet. Without a well defined governance model (and should
your intranet survive the naturally occurring politics of competing priorities
amongst various stakeholders – communications, IT, human resources, various
business units, etc.) then the value the intranet or portal delivers will be
severely hampered.
OWNERSHIP
“If you
don’t have structure, you’re going to constantly run into politics,” said Terry
Lister, Partner and Leader of IBM Canada’s Business Consulting Services.
“Without a governance structure with standards, different silos try to do
something in parallel (their own thing) and it costs more… and will lessen the
user experience.”
Much of
the problem lies in the immaturity of this nascent intranet technology. With
the rational consolidation of intranet sites and services under a central site
or portal, disparate departments and stakeholders such as corporate
communications, human resources, IT and varying business units now must
cooperate under a lone umbrella with a single intranet home page. Along with
this ‘forced’ cooperation comes the predictable politics and competition for
ownership of the intranet (and competition for valued home page real estate).
The
problem lies with the traditional growth and evolution of the intranet.
Initially, when intranets first came online in the early to mid-1990s, they
were nothing more than a web brochure (a.k.a. ‘brochureware’) that sat on a
small server under the desk of a Web developer who served as designer, writer
and Webmaster.
GOVERNANCE
MODELS
I
categorize intranet governance by four broad approaches or models:
Decentralized (no single
owner; do-what-you-like)
Centralized a single owner or
department controls it all; highly bureaucratic; common in small organizations)
Collaborative (shared
ownership via committee)
Hybrid, centralized (single
owner, with collaborative accountability, decentralized content ownership)
COLLABORATIVE
GOVERNANCE
The most
common governance model in recent years, in medium to large-size organizations,
has been the collaborative model. The collaborative model is most often focused
on a cross-representative steering committee representing the major functional
stakeholders:
Communications
Human Resources
Operations
Information Technology
Business units / departments
This
model is most successful when the committee is championed by one or two key
executives, often the CIO, the head of Communications, or HR. Instead of no
owner, or one single owner, a collaborative team governs the intranet through
the application of policies, standards and templates. This committee is
typically responsible for the direction, vision, prioritization of projects,
and future evolution.
About
two-thirds of medium to large-size organizations have some form of collaborative
governance and some form of intranet ‘steering committee’ or council. They
typical committee has 6-10 individuals (mostly from IT, HR &
communications) and is focused on:
Mandate and vision
Business objectives
Policies and standardization
Project prioritization
Trouble-shooting and conflict
resolution
HYBRID,
CENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE
The
hybrid, centralized governance model is one that combines elements of all three
previous models:
Centralized ownership
Centralized policy making and
future development decision-making
Centralized technology and
content management platforms
Decentralized content
publishing and ownership
Decentralized application
ownership / management
The
hybrid model is very closely aligned to the collaborative model, with two
significant exceptions: there is often a supporting steering committee, but it
falls under a single intranet owner (or co-owners); and the role of IT is
usually reduced from a collaborative owner to a committee member without
ownership, but rather a support or enabler role for the business owner (often
communications or HR). So while the collaborative model has a committee as the
end intranet owner, the hybrid model puts the committee under an owner (though
sometimes this business owner is in fact IT).
FREE
WEBINAR
Learn
more about intranet governance during the free, one-hour webinar on September
23 (12pm EST). Contact
us directly to secure an advanced spot on the webinar.
This
is the definitive ‘quick start’ guide to intranets, providing
intranet teams with a to-the-point overview of how to plan, design,
manage and grow intranets.
A
beautifully printed A5-sized 110-page book, this volume covers key
topics for every intranet team:
Six
phases of intranet evolution
1:
The intranet is born
2:
Rapid organic growth
3:
Repeated redesigns
4:
Intranet usability
5:
Useful, not just usable
6:
Business tool
Four
purposes of the intranet
How
to find out what staff need
How
to design the intranet
How
to deliver great content
The
role of the intranet team
How
to plan intranet improvements
Few
teams have time to read a weighty tome on intranets, and what is
needed is a clear ‘map’ for delivering a successful intranet.
Drawing on experience from intranet teams across the globe, every
page of this book provides key insights, ideas, models and
methodologies.
“What
every intranet team should know” is perfect for a first-time
intranet manager, an inexperienced contributor, or for someone who is
just plain stuck or frustrated with the lack of direction for their
intranet. The book is a short read, and a good value at only $US89 –
a great bang-for-the buck, how-to resource for intranet managers and
consultants.
“This
is, quite deliberately, a slim volume,” says author James
Robertson. “We have distilled our knowledge to a few key concepts,
to get you kick-started on the journey to a remarkable intranet.”
Once
a nice-to-have or a future wish, Intranet 2.0 tools such as blogs,
wikis and other vehicles have become mainstream, and are present in
nearly 50% of organizations (regardless of size) in the Western
World.
This
open, free webinar will review the findings of the Intranet 2.0
Global Survey and offer attendees a chance to learn why 2.0 has
become an imperative, and what to consider / plan when implementing
these social media tools.
It
comes up less frequently in 2009 then it first did when I formed
North America's first intranet consulting firm (Prescient Digital
Media) in early 2001, but the definition of an intranet is still
debatable.
Toby
Ward's definition of an intranet (first committed to paper in 2001 in
the Finding
ROI white paper):
A
private network, similar to the Internet and using the same protocols
and technology, that is contained within an enterprise. It may
consist of many inter-linked local area networks (LANs), desktop
computers, websites and portals, and email system(s). However, in
common vernacular, the intranet is the internal website home page
that is for employees only -- and the other internal websites that
link to it.
Wikipedia
definition of an intranet:
An
intranet is a private
computer
network that uses Internet
technologies to securely share any part of an organization's
information or operational systems with its employees. Sometimes the
term refers only to the organization's internal website,
but often it is a more extensive part of the organization's computer
infrastructure and private websites are an important component and
focal point of internal communication and collaboration.
No
surprises, really.
Another
term that causes confusion, more so than the intranet, is “portal”
or “corporate portal” (sometimes referred to as an “enterprise
information portal”).
Toby
Ward's definition of an intranet portal (first committed to paper in
version 2 (2003) of the Finding
ROI white paper):
A
primary website on the enterprise intranet. A web-based gateway to
most, if not all, tools and information on the enterprise intranet.
The portal can be a ‘catch all’ for all of the intranet, or a
business unit or function specific portal (i.e. Sales or HR portal).
The characteristics that best distinguish it from a standard intranet
home page include:
3-
enterprise search (search that extends beyond the intranet home page,
but doesn't necessarily search every single shared drive, email
folder & enterprise database).
Wikipedia
definition of an intranet portal:
An
intranet portal is the gateway that unifies access to all
enterprise information and applications[1]
on an intranet.
It is a tool that helps a company manage its data, applications, and
information more easily, and through personalized views. Some portal
solutions today are able to integrate legacy
applications, other portals objects, and handle thousands of user
requests. For enterprise user, it is also known as an enterprise
portal.
Now
the lines blur somewhat as different consultants and vendors use
different definitions (mostly to serve their sales needs). I've never
seen a portal that “unifies access to all” enterprise information
and applications, though “unifies access” is open to
interpretation. If a simple hypertext link to a database qualifies as
unified access then perhaps this is true. However, this is why my
definition for the past 6 years was written to say “most, if not
all, tools and information.” I don't think a portal is an “all”
or “nothing” scenario, but it certainly seems to fit if the
portal unifies “most” information and applications.
Why
are we even talking about this?
The
question once again arose last week when I wrote about the importance
of strategy and planning for an intranet (see Intranet
strategy & execution). An intranet strategy (which may
include one universal plan or multiple plans) should encompass all
internal facing websites, and apply standards across the network,
including all social media, email and related systems.
The
intranet strategy should include the use of a portal (where
applicable), internal websites, social media, shared drives, and
related knowledge management systems. Exclusions might include
specialized applications that are for a small, minority audience such
as senior executives and the finance team (e.g. Oracle financials,
board of directors extranet, CRM system, etc.)
Here's
the rub: regardless of your definition, you require a solid intranet
strategy that defines what can be done by whom (roles and
responsibilities) and according to defined standards (rules).
Having
trouble selling an intranet redesign? Or securing funding for a new
CMS or social media tool?
During
times of economic downturn, organizations are seeking to discover new
ways to make the most of their investments, but too many fail to
understand the intranet's value and potential to increase business
performance.
Join
this free webinar to learn how to convince executives to cough up the
cash for your intranet redesign.
