Intranet evolution, best practices, and case studies by Toby Ward.

Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online Blog Flux Directory
Subscribe with myFeedster
This Month
March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Web Development & Design Blogs - Blog Top Sites © 2006 Prescient Digital Media. All rights reserved. www.PrescientDigital.com
View Article  Intranet case study: Atomic Energy Employee Portal

Troubled intranets often share many of the same characteristic problems:

 

  • No defined ownership
  • No content standards and policies
  • Site proliferation and ‘sprawl’
  • Poor usability and navigability (“I can’t find anything!”)
  • Low use and employee up-take

This was the case with Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL, makers of CANDU nuclear reactors) when I started to work with them two years ago. This case study was presented to today to the 2006 Information Highways conference in Toronto. Turning the dream into reality: Harnessing people power to create a high productivity intranet was a joint presentation with my colleague and client Andre Robillard, CIO for Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

 

A little more than two years ago when AECL started down the road to implementing a new intranet portal, the Canadian crown corporation was saddled with a number of challenges:

 

  • Ongoing news and information not communicated in a timely and consistent fashion
  • Business objectives and priorities not clearly communicated
  • Absence of a Communication plan
  • Too much reliance on email bulletins for communications
  • Senior management not taking responsibility for communication
  • Employee Intranet not effective:
    • No governance or control
    • No consistent look and feel
    • Information not current or useful
    • Publishing requires technical skills
    • Difficult to find information

The old AECL intranet:

 

 

  

To address these challenges AECL hired Prescient Digital Media to develop an integrated communications strategy that addressed email communications, people and manager communications, and the intranet. Specifically, the process included the creation of a new intranet plan with a number of key priorities:

 

  • Develop and formalize a governance model
  • Develop an  intranet editorial policy
  • Hire an Editor-In-Chief
  • Develop Standardization policy that enforces intranet standards and limits individual intranet development
  • Develop an email “Acceptable Use” policy
  • Eliminate all stand-alone sites by consolidating them under a single intranet portal with a single navigation schema.
  • Design a new “look & feel” that supports the AECL brand and communication needs.
  • Deploy a full database content management platform and full employee self-service and online form submission

The process moved from planning to the technology selection (driven by an aggressive RFP that had a number of vendors work for the business) and an implementation of about 2.5 months of a new content management system/portal product (IronPoint).

 

New intranet portal: myAECL

 

 

Though launching a new intranet portal is all well and dandy, the work does not stop there. AECL still had a number of key issues to address in the months following the launch:

 

  • Hiring and orienting a new Editor-in-Chief
  • Developing daily news articles
  • Setting up efficient content processes
  • Migrating old environment to new
  • Changing Behaviors
  • Training content providers to use new tool
  • Evolving Formatting standards and guidelines

 

Andre Robillard shared some of the key lessons learned in redesigning an intranet and implementing a new portal with new processes and standards. He has a number of recommendations for any organization attempting the same:

 

  • Clearly define the communication problems in your organization
  • Assess where you are today by polling staff
  • Create a new communication plan based on best practices, employee feedback, and company needs
  • Get executive approval of new internal communication plan
  • Create a new Intranet design that provides staff with any easy to use tool, plus satisfies the communication plan
  • Issue an RFP
  • Implement using the 80/20 rule
  • Use a vendor that does this for a living

By the way, have you noticed that the CIO keeps focusing on and talking about “communications” and not the technology?

 

CIO Robillard understands the driver is communications and customer service, and that the intranet portal is more than just a technology solution; it’s a business system to support the business. As CIO he’s just one of several owners on a governance council that also includes representatives from Communications, HR and Customer Service. I’d like to see more IT organizations like Robillard’s that are less concerned with ownership and more concerned with business results.

 

If you have a question about this case study – whether its related to process, content, technology, people, planning, etc. – feel free to post your question or comment below and I’ll get back to you shortly thereafter.

 

© 2006 Toby Ward - Prescient Digital Media

View Article  Good news and good news for world’s largest and most troubled intranet

The world’s biggest, most expensive and troubled intranet – the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) – has delivered good news this week. Intranet user satisfaction for the fourth quarter ending December 2005 hit 74%. Unfortunately, user satisfaction fell 4% from 78% during the third quarter.

 

What’s the good news you ask? Firstly, the Navy and Marine Corps intranet team has the intelligence to ask for their soldiers, sailors, marines and civilian employees’ opinions once per quarter. NMCI is measuring and tracking user satisfaction and acting on it to improve the end product.

 

The second reason that this is good news is that more than 19,000 Navy and Marine Corps personnel took the time to take the survey – a survey that is done once per quarter! Now there were 141,000+ surveys sent out (big organization the Navy and Marine Corps), which is a response rate of 14%. That’s not bad given they do a survey once per month and many of those personnel are focused on saving lives. (I’ve worked with dozens of companies and their intranets and talked with hundreds of others… and there are a lot of companies that won’t free up a few thousand dollars for one survey a year! These companies prefer to guess at what their target audience needs. Shameful, but true).

The other good news this week is that the Navy has appointed a new chief to oversee the $8 billion intranet. A reorganization in the ranks made NMCI director Rear Admiral James B Godwin III the program manager mantle reporting directly to The Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition. The reorganization also has led to restructuring of the Navy and Marine Corps program offices as well as “realignment of server consolidations and legacy network reduction.”

Let’s hope the changes are more than just window dressing for a project riddled with issues. Rear Admiral Godwin is given the chore of cleaning-up what has been a messy project suffering from bad public relations, cost problems, vendor (EDS) issues, security issues and even a lobbyist scandal (See $9 Billion Bugs for U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Intranet and World’s Biggest Intranet and Scandal rocks world’s biggest intranet and EDS – king of intranet pain).

On another note, it looks like the Rear Admiral’s team has given the NMCI a tweaked design. Quite honestly I think it’s rather weak… but 74% user satisfaction is a far more important metric than what I think…