Intranet evolution, best practices, and case studies by Toby Ward.

Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online Blog Flux Directory
Subscribe with myFeedster
This Month
October 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Web Design Blog Top Sites © 2006 Prescient Digital Media. All rights reserved. www.PrescientDigital.com
Main Page  »  Portal
View Article  Portals have stalled

Despite the advances in technology and the cries and demands for more and better quality, portal solutions – more specifically their use in corporations – have barely evolved in the past few years. The same challenges that existed at the turn of the millennium continue to dominate today.

 

Continued corporate intranet challenges include:

 

  • intranet sprawl; renegade development
  • competing ownership and political issues
  • limited or no personalization
  • too many passwords; single sign-on not realized
  • low user take-up; usage not living up to expectations
  • complex, unfriendly publishing

 

Nielsen Norman Group has issued another ‘analysis’ on the state of corporate portals. Though author Jakob Nielsen does not indicate how many portals he and his colleagues actually studied, there are some 25+ organizations listed in the analysis (see Intranet Portals Get Streamlined).

 

Nielsen also believes there has been little progress in the past three years since his last analysis. “In fact, none of the forty-five best practices documented in the report's first edition have changed. Yes, we've gained many new insights, but what was good three years ago continues to be good today.

 

Of the biggest challenges and disappointing findings, Nielsen cites several:

  • Portal solutions still don't offer satisfactory usability out of the box. This is more of a disgrace now than it was in the past, because we now know so much more about intranet usability. Vendors need to integrate this knowledge into their software.
  • Single sign-on is still more a dream than a reality. It's one of the most desired portal features and creates huge savings in help-desk calls, but most companies are not yet there. Users still must log in again and again. Multiple sign-on does offer one usability benefit, however: it can help employees feel more comfortable about information privacy when accessing highly sensitive data.
  • Personalization for individual users is still rare. Organizations continue to find role-based personalization more useful and to use it more frequently. For example, some companies present certain information or portlets only to people with a particular job title or people who work in a particular location.
  • Governance has always been more important to portal success than technical issues, and this finding was even stronger in the new study. One popular approach is to create a steering group representing various business areas. Projects also need to establish firm rules for enforcing design consistency and migrating content and applications into the portal.
  • ROI is woefully under-documented. Too few portal projects collect good productivity metrics, though some companies are now beginning to measure themselves against our intranet testing report's time-on-task benchmarks and using this data to compute their savings relative to average intranets. More typically, portal projects measure user satisfaction and usage. For example, Fujitsu Siemens Computers in Germany found that its intranet use tripled after the portal went online. (Doubled use is more common across the projects we've studied.) Since intranet use is completely voluntary, increased use is a strong indication that a portal helps employees do their work, though it's still an indirect metric.

These Nielsen Reports are not bad – they provide some decent insight. However, I’m not sure they’re worth the $200 or so dollars. Basically, companies volunteer their information in the form of case studies in the hope they’re chosen and singled-out as a success. These ‘case studies’ are mostly candy –they’re screenshots and sanitized looks at the current state of the intranet. Rarely do you get the real story and understand the real challenges, problems and shortcomings.

 

Yesterday on the Intranet World Tour featuring IBM’s W3, Liam Cleaver was exceedingly frank about IBM’s challenges – despite having one of the best intranets in the World. Case studies such as IBM’s are the real, true value case studies – where you are given insight into not only the successes but the challenges and problems (stay tuned for the next Intranet World Tour stop: Microsoft).

 

And there’s the rub: portals haven’t advanced much in the past three years and it’s because of many, many problems – some of which are cited above.

 

RELATED FEATURES:

Intranet World Tour: IBM leads the World (discussion below)

Leading intranet case study: IBM’s W3

View Article  Intranet World Tour: IBM leads the World

IBM’s intranet portal, W3, may be the very best in the World. I’ve not seen them all but I have seen hundreds of intranets over the past few years and IBM is definitely one of the best if not the best.

 

IBM showcased its goods during the Intranet Insider World Tour Series -- featuring IBM’s renowned W3 portal webinar hosted by myself and IBM’s Liam Cleaver (presented by Communitelligence.com – the brainchild of communications afficianado and all-around good guy John Gerstner).  

IBM’s success is really, really impressive. Here’s just a sample of some of their numbers:  

Ø       Usage and value

§         80% of IBM employees access the intranet daily

§         68% view the intranet as crucial to their jobs

§         1.7 million page views per day (or about 6 page views per employee per day)

Ø       Employee retention:

§         52% are more satisfied to be an IBM employee because of information obtained on w3

Ø       e-HR

§         Employee satisfaction from 40% to 90%

§         Health care enrolment

§         Performance measurement, skill & career development

§         Compensation, stock options, pensions, insurance

§         Time off, transfers, eldercare, adoption, etc.

Ø       e-learning

§         52% of employee training delivered on the Web

§         200,000+ received online e-learning

§         $284 million saved annually

Ø       e-meetings

§         40,000 employees use every month

§         Saves travel & setup costs

§         Combines instant messaging, presentations, voice

Ø       ROI

§         More than $1.3 billion in cost savings ($683 million in direct cost savings)

 

 

IBM’s Intranet Portal: W3 (home page)

If you didn’t get a chance to attend this session then I strongly suggest you order the CD (visit the Intranet Insider on Communitelligence.com for details). 

View Article  Intranet kingdom remains an unknown quantity

The corporate intranet or portal has always played the poor cousin to the customer-facing Website. Most executives have traditionally viewed, and sadly continue to view, the corporate intranet as a cost-center with little perceived and almost no measured value.

 

In fact, some executives I’ve interviewed have proven to be down right daft (see Stupid begets stupid). A CEO of a major financial services company with a horribly pathetic intranet that barely earns the title ‘intranet’ was famous for saying: “I think we’ve invested too much in technology already.” This company makes money hand over fist.

 

Another, a Director of Human Resources, once told me during a business requirements analysis for crafting a new intranet plan, “I don’t understand why we need an intranet... I mean we have a pretty good phone system that cost us a lot!”

 

However, you’ll have to forgive some of these folks as god bless them they just don’t know better given their unshakable faith in the fax machine, telex, and their respective assistants who can type their handwritten emails.

 

While intranets while likely always play second fiddle to the Internet sites with the larger budget and customer focus, they are catching up. A centralized intranet or portal home page was still largely a rare commodity in the mid-90s. Today, almost all large size organizations have them – in the form of an off-the-shelf portal product or something custom-built and pieced together by the internal IT team (though usually lacking the level of customization or personalization options that characterize many of the portal products offered by leaders such as Plumtree, Oracle, IBM and others).

 

How many companies have intranets and what does the average intranet look like? Good question. An exact count is not readily available but and IDC study in 2001 found that about 85% of medium to large size organizations have an intranet – in some form.

 

Author Martin White has done some research and it appears that Canada is leading the way. “The country with the highest intranet penetration is reported to be Canada with 58% of businesses having an intranet, says White, founder of Intranet Focus Ltd. in England. “The U.K. figure is reported at 52% (compared to 9% from the National Statistics survey) and the U.S. figure is 48%.

 

In the UK alone, White estimates that the number must at least break 200,000 as of late 2003.To put that in perspective, the total number of intranets therefore is likely in the millions.

 

The average look and composition of the corporate intranet is even fuzzier. I’ve had the good fortunate to work as a consultant with dozens of companies and their respective intranets and portals. Believe me, no two intranets are alike.

 

There are however some universal similarities in the evolution of the average corporate intranet:

 

·     The first intranet was a simple HTML page or collection of pages with static information – often policies and/or some newsletter stories.

·     Started and managed by an IT person with a server under their desk.

·     First appeared somewhere between the early and mid-1990s.

·     HR and communications often followed with their own intranet sites – other business units and groups soon followed.

·     Within a couple of years the ‘organic’ evolution of the intranet became a rag-tag sprawl of mismatching sites with little or no standards, policies or economies of scale.

 

In the majority of organizations this organic growth produced a kingdom of intranet feudal states of varying qualities – and each state highly protective of their property and assets. Usually some bold manager who is not afraid of a little politics and blood-letting has stepped-up and tired to convince these nobles that the sprawling mish-mash of intranet sites and pages were confusing employees and wasting the organization thousands if not millions of dollars due to lack of standards and cooperation amongst the various feudal properties. In some organizations this intranet sprawl was gross and bloated.

 

By the late 1990s IBM had about 10,000 intranet sites representing well over 10 million pages (at best count). Enough was enough and Big Blue put in place a federated governance model with universal standards and began consolidating and shutting down sites. Yes some lords were upset, but many fell in line and this wise and necessary effort has saved IBM tens of millions of dollars in a few short years (see Leading intranet case study: IBM’s W3).

 

As for value, the ROI is there but it’s not being measured. A 2003 study by Prescient Digital Media revealed that only 6% of organizations undertake ongoing, specific measurement of the ROI of their intranet. Occasional measurement is undertaken by only 26% of organizations and 51% either do no measurement, don’t know if they do, or only guess at the ROI. 18% are considering ROI measurements.

 

It is not that organizations don’t care about ROI. They do care. But actual measurement is a little more elusive and difficult to undertake.

 

“Although ROI has not been established in our current intranet we do see the potential and the need to create a more efficient intranet to be able to reduce costs and engage employees in a more direct method,” said one ROI survey respondent.

 

However, ROI is the key to success. If executives view the intranet as a cost center, then it’s incumbent of the managers to prove and measure the value. Only through measurement will the intranet become a measured quantity and a proven asset to the kingdom.

 

Tomorrow: Measuring intranet ROI

 

RELATED ITEMS:

 

ROI Remains Guesswork At Most Companies

Intranet Insider World Tour Series -- featuring IBM’s renowned W3 portal

View Article  $9 Billion Bugs for U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Intranet (back issue)

Most I.T. projects have some hurdles or bugs. The $9 billion U.S. Navy-Marine Corps intranet (NMCI) is no exception.

 

Of course the military would use an acronym like NMCI, but I was hoping that we would be privy to one of those cutting-edge mission names like Mission Intranet Freedom or Mission Global Information Dominance... Ooops! That moniker might be letting the cat-out-of-the-bag....

 

Speaking at a conference of 1,200 military vendors in Norfolk, Virginia, the NMCI head honcho Rear Admiral James B. Goodwin III lamented about some of the challenges. As reported in the Virginian-Pilot, some of the bugs have included e-mail problems for Admiral Michael G. Mullen, President Bush’s nominee for chief of naval operations.

 

Rear Adm Goodwin joked, ““Probably not the e-mail I wanted to see from my new boss, but it’s one of the realities right now.”

For those not familiar with the project, EDS was hired to work with the Navy and Marine Corps to build a "comprehensive, enterprise-wide initiative that will make the full range of network-based information services available to Sailors and Marines for day-to-day activities and in war.”

The $9 billion project is in its fifth year.

NMCI features more than your average run-of-the-mill secure access to US Armed Forces information and systems and “universal access to integrated voice, video and data communications.

While it is not complete the Navy Marine intranet will "afford pier-side connectivity to Navy vessels in port. And it will link more than 360,000 desktops across the United States as well as sites in Puerto Rico, Iceland and Cuba.”

The Navy and Marine Corps use the NMCI to achieve "a number of critical objectives:

  • Enhanced network security
  • Interoperability with CINCs and other Services
  • Knowledge sharing across the globe
  • Increased productivity
  • Improved systems reliability and quality of service
  • Reduced cost of voice, video and data services

Want to know more? The public can visit the intranet home page at www.nmciinfo.usmc.mil (updated URL).

View Article  Marketing the intranet

HALIFAX, NS - If you build it they will not come. Of course, there will always be the curious and keeners and those that inherently understand it, but an intranet firing at maximum value requires marketing.

 

In a survey of 500+ intranet managers by Melcrum Research, the number four issue or challenge facing intranet managers was low take-up or usage (the number one issue was ownership/politics).

 

One of the reasons why even the best intranets need to be marketed to employees is that computer-based workers are often exceptionally busy and do not have time to explore and surf the intranet. They need to be educated as to what is there and why it is of value to both them as individual workers and also to the organization as a whole. Employees need to be ‘sold’.

 

A couple of years ago I was undertaking some research on an insurance company’s intranet. My research included a company-wide survey which included the participation of some 2700 employees. One of the key findings underscored one of the ubiquitous findings at many organizations – people like the intranet but weren’t using it. In fact, employees rated the intranet a 7.5 out of 10.

 

 

Upcoming Teleseminar:

Intranet Insider World Tour: IBM’s W3 – October 26

 

So if the intranet was rated so highly, how come employees weren’t using it? I dug deeper in employee focus groups and found the answer: the average employee had been to the intranet home page and liked what they saw but they hadn’t spent much time on the intranet and therefore didn’t know what was there. As such, the average employee didn’t understand that the intranet was a valuable resource because they didn’t know better. Mystery solved; employee use was not for a lack of value, but for lack of knowledge. The employee population needed to be better educated as to what the intranet offered and why it was of value to them. The intranet needed marketing.

 

In short, every intranet needs a marketing plan followed by execution with results. Sodhexo USA knows this all too well. The leading provider of food and facilities management in North America and 110,000+ employees has a built a marketing plan that is critical to the success of its intranet portal, Sodhexonet. Angelo Ioffreda, VP, Internal Communications Sodhexo USA, shares their intranet marketing plan that focuses on six major components:

 

  1. Promote ongoing SodexhoNet name recognition and key wins.
  1. Highlight the variety of useful content through on- and off-line.
  1. Increase essential content and applications available only online.
  1. Increase content – including fun content – that drives repeat visits.
  1. Encourage continued endorsements from senior leadership.
  1. Support content owners – increase skill level and enthusiasm, identify and leverage best practices.

As far as tactics go, dust out your old marketing texts. Marketing tactics could include:

·         E-mail broadcasts

·         newsletter stories

·         internal press conference

·         executive promotion

·         hosted chats with the CEO

·         posters and mousepads

·         premiums (handouts)

·         screensavers

·         etc.

A regional subsidiary of a large financial/investment services company embarked on an ambitious marketing campaign to promote the launch of their redesigned intranet portal. The campaign included an email campaign, promotional cookies for each employee, posters and even a professionally produced 10-minute promotional video replete with a famous voice as the narrator. The CEO personally launched the new intranet with an internal press conference for employees. In total, the company spent about $20 per employee on promoting the new portal.

As for results, Sodexho can bear witness. As a result of their efforts, those never using SodhexoNet dropped from 19% to 1% and registered users who visit the site monthly increased from 55% to 90% (see Best practices case study: Sodhexo USA for more details).

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

Nexus of Intranet Success

5 Winning Intranet Characteristics

Does Your Intranet Measure-Up?

ROI Remains Guesswork At Most Companies

 

UPCOMING TELESEMINAR:

Intranet Insider World Tour: IBM’s W3 – October 26

View Article  Best practices case study: Sodexho USA

Large companies with many thousands of employees dispersed across great regions and dozens of locations require an effective intranet. Communications, connection and community are critical making the intranet a mandatory requirement for success.

 

Sodhexo USA provides a solid example of how to deploy just such an intranet for a large diversely situated organization – and it’s one of the biggest companies you may not know. Sodexho USA (www.sodexhoUSA.com) is the leading provider of food and facilities management in North America, with $6 billion in annual revenues and 110,000+ employees. Sodexho runs cafeterias, housekeeping in the hospitality sector, grounds keeping, plant operations and maintenance and laundry services to more than 6,000 companies principally in health care, schools, and the military.

 

Headquartered in Gaithersburg, MD, Sodexho has employees spread out across and in all corners of the continent. An even greater challenge than the geographic disparity of its employees is the nature of their work. The vast majority of these employees are hourly workers who are not desktop workers with their own computers – they’re on the frontlines rather preparing and serving food, cleaning, and performing site operations. The intranet home page, SodhexoNet, is a tying bond that links most of the managers and management of this diverse and disparate group.

 

While most employees are not registered users with access, the value of the intranet drives the growth in the number that do use the intranet. Registered users have grown from 2,000 in April, 1999, to more than 14,000 users today.

 

 

Like all effective systems, SodhexoNet has a vision: SodexhoNet is a one-stop shop for all of our managers’ information needs and an indispensable part of a Sodexho work day.”

 

Accompanying the vision is some practical but key goals:

·     Essential business and communications tool

·     Robust, timely, relevant, accurate content

·     Intuitive navigation

·     Quick access

·     Easy to search

·     Feedback capacity

·     Cost-effectiveness

 

SodhexoNet’s greatest strength however is its management team, lead by corporate communications. To be specific, the strength lies in the team’s understanding that the intranet must intimately understand its target audience and constantly measure its performance. By measuring its success, Sodhexo knows where to concentrate its efforts and resources and constantly strive for improvement.

 

Among the many measures the intranet team tracks (for the last year measured compared to the previous year):

 

·     User behavior and how usage is trending (those never using SodhexoNet dropped from 19% to 1%)

·     SodhexoNet as a “valuable resource” to employees (from 74 to 84%)

·     Registered users who visit the site monthly (from 55 to 90%)

·     Most visited pages (career center, HR, health care, phone book, and search)

·     Most searched terms (forms, recipe collection, performance appraisal)

·     Return on investment (where possible)

 

One of SodhexoNet’s more innovative and successful tools is its SuperSleuth sales lead program. SuperSleuth is an intranet web page and application that encourages employees to submit sales leads and prospective clients via the intranet. Successful leads submitted via the SuperSleuth intranet page generate cash rewards of up to $1000 for the person making the submission. Sodhexo says it has contributed to a 100% increase in sales leads in the past year. Let me repeat: a 100% increase in company sales leads. Wow!

 

While the site has evolved considerably and its value has grown measurably in recent years, it hasn’t been without considerable effort and some lessons learned, says Angelo Ioffreda, VP, Internal Communications.

 

Amongst the key lessons learned:

 

·     Create a vision

·     Partner with IT (“big time,” says Ioffreda stressing the importance of a healthy working relationship with IT) – and HR

·     Establish clear standards for the site

·     Make end-users the center of your universe

·     Incorporate real-time feedback from end-users

·     Track user behavior

·     Make content ‘king’

·     Involve, support, and communicate with your content owners

·     Develop an editorial / programming mindset

·     Strive for intuitive navigation

·     Improve your search and speed

·     Commit to continuous improvement in product and processes

·     Make your site a business tool

o        Reduce costs

o        Raise efficiency

o        Bring in revenue

 

Sodhexo also knows that just simply creating an effective intranet is not enough. Successful intranets also require marketing. More on Sodexho’s efforts and how to market your intranet in the next installment.

 

View Article  Leading intranet case study: IBM’s W3

IBM’s intranet portal is one of my featured best intranets, and favorite intranets, at this year’s The Best of the Internet and Intranet 2005 presentation at the 2005 IABC International Conference in Washington, DC.

 

W3 is the intranet home page to IBM’s to approximately 300,000 employees worldwide. W3 is a key component of IBM’s “Workforce Transformation Strategy” that lists the following as key objectives:

 

·     Reduce complexity

·     Bring the marketplace inside

·