Social media and intranet case studies, best practices, & evolution by Toby Ward.
View Article  Social Media Becoming Mainstream on Corporate Intranet

 

I recently received a copy of the Intranet Global Survey from Toby Ward, CEO of Prescient Digital Media. The headlight quote was encouraging, “Employees want to work for progressive and innovative organizations, and expect 2.0 environments from employers of choice.” The study included input from 561 organizations of all sizes from across the globe and the results reveal rapid adoption of social media on the corporate intranet in the past year.

 

The breakdown of specific types of social media on intranets include:

  • 47% have wikis (10% have no plans or interest)
  • 45% have blogs (11% have no plans or interest)
  • 46% have discussion forums (9% have no plans or interest)
  • 37% have RSS (12% have no plans or interest)
  • 23% have podcasts (30% have no plans or interest)
  • 9% have social networking (20% with no plans or interest)

 

I am not sure which is better the high numbers who have already adopted or the low numbers with no plans or interests. The study concluded that an organization without Intranet 2.0 tools, or plans to use them, risks being out-flanked by their competition.

 

Read Bill Ives' complete column from (New Study Finds Social Media Becoming Mainstream on Corporate Intranet)

Technorati Profile


View Article  Intranet 2.0: The investment vs satisfaction corollary
Like anything, you get what you pay for. However, that doesn't mean a social media or Intranet 2.0 solution can't be an inexpensive solution, but it does require proper planning & governance, and usually some customization.


According to the results of the Intranet 2.0 Global Survey (561 organizations of all sizes from across the planet), 46% of those with 2.0 tools have spent nothing or very little on the solution:


  • 46% have spent $10,000 or less

  • 35% have spent between $10,000 and $100,00; 19% have spent $100,000 or more


It should probably come as no surprise then that satisfaction levels with 2.0 tools is also quite low:


  • Satisfaction rates with executives is dangerously poor: 38% of executives rate the 2.0 tools as poor or very poor; a lowly 23% rate them as good or very good

  • Employee satisfaction is almost poor: 35% of organizations say employee satisfaction with the 2.0 tools is poor or very poor; only 27% rate the tools as good or very good

  • Only 29% of organizations rate the tool functionality as good or very good; 24% rate them as poor or very poor


In short, organizations are spending very little on their 2.0 initiatives, and the satisfaction levels are correspondingly low. Investment doesn't necessarily deliver satisfaction, but a look into the technologies used reveals some further insight. The vast majority of organizations with 2.0 tools use free, open source solutions or those bundled with a platform solution like SharePoint:


  • 48% of organizations use SharePoint

  • 20% of organizations use Facebook

  • 17% of organizations use MediaWiki

  • 16% of organizations use WordPress


There isn't a single, dedicated 2.0 licensed solution used by more than 13% of organizations. The vast majority use free, open source with the exception of SharePoint which sports 2.0 tools that leave very little to be desired (although the social media components in SharePoint 2010 are supposed to be spectacular, and represent a heavy portion of the investment in the SharePoint upgrade).


Two lessons are worth noting:


1 - Vanilla solutions will deliver vanilla results (without customization tailored to the target audience.

2 - Change management is tantamount to success. These tools require promotion, education, and communications. If you build it they will not come necessarily, employees need to be instructed accordingly.


ALSO READ:

Intranet 2.0 Becomes Mandatory


THE INTRANET 2.0 GLOBAL SURVEY:

The findings of the Intranet 2.0 Global Survey are highlighted in the report "Intranet 2.0: social media becomes mainstream on the corporate intranet."


To download a free, summarized version of the Intranet 2.0 report please visit:

http://www.prescientdigital.com/articles/download-summary-report-of-intranet-2-0-global-survey


To purchase the full, 44-page Intranet 2.0 report of analysis & recommendations please visit: http://www.prescientdigital.com/articles/purchase-intranet-2-0-global-survey-report


Follow me on Twitter

Technorati Profile


View Article  Adopt Intranet 2.0 or risk failure
An organization without a 2.0 strategy risks being left behind, or outright failure (though death may be slow). Employees want to work for progressive and innovative organizations, and expect 2.0 environments from employers of choice.


561 organizations of all sizes from across the planet participated in the Intranet 2.0 Global Survey and the results reveal rapid adoption of social media on the corporate intranet in the past year.


Once a nice-to-have or a future wish, Intranet 2.0 tools such as blogs, wikis and other vehicles have become mainstream, and are present in nearly 50% of organizations (regardless of size) in the Western World.


Intranet blogs, wikis and discussion forums are quite pervasive, while other less common tools such as podcasts and mashups remain an after-thought at most organizations:


  • 47% have intranet wikis (17% enterprise deployment); 10% have no plans or interest

  • 45% have intranet blogs (13% enterprise deployment); 11% have no plans or interest

  • 46% have intranet discussion forums (19% enterprise use); 9% have no plans or interest

  • 46% have intranet instant messaging (29% enterprise use); 21% have no plans or interest

  • 19% have intranet social networking (6% enterprise use); 20% have no plans or interest


Microsoft dominance


Microsoft is leading the 2.0 charge and dominating all competition. For those organizations that have deployed 2.0 tools inside the firewall, about half of all organizations have SharePoint (in some shape or form):


  • 48% of organizations use SharePoint

  • 20% of organizations use Facebook,17% of organizations use MediaWiki,16% of organizations use WordPress


Cost of Intranet 2.0


Intranet 2.0 is cheap. Of those organizations that have implemented 2.0 tools, almost half have spent $10,000 or less on these tools:


  • 46% have spent $10,000 or less

  • 35% have spent between $10,000 and $100,000,19% have spent $100,000 or more


Poor execution


Sadly though, despite the low cost of entry and ease of technology, satisfaction levels with Intranet 2.0 tools are dangerously low:


  • Only 29% of organizations rate the tool functionality as good or very good; 24% rate them as poor or very poor

  • Satisfaction rates with executives is dangerously low: only 23% of executives rate the 2.0 tools as good or very good; 38% rate them as poor or very poor


To download a free, summarized version of the report please visit:

http://www.prescientdigital.com/articles/download-summary-report-of-intranet-2-0-global-survey


To purchase the full, 44-page report of analysis & recommendations please visit: http://www.prescientdigital.com/articles/purchase-intranet-2-0-global-survey-report


-- 30 --


For more information please contact:


Toby Ward, CEO

Prescient Digital Media

416.926.8800

toby@prescientdigital.com


About the Intranet 2.0 Survey


561 organizations took the survey:

  • 36% come from the U.S; 24% from Europe; 11% from Canada; 11% from Australia / New Zealand; 10% from UK

  • 61% have more than 1,000 employees; 32% have 6,000 or more employees; 39% have less than 1000 employees

  • 53% of organizations have had an intranet for 7 or more years; 17% of organizations have had an intranet for 2 years or less

  • 13% of the organizations are government; 13% from technology; 12% from financial services; 6% from healthcare

  • The survey was led by Toby Ward, President, Prescient Digital Media


About Prescient Digital Media


Prescient Digital Media is a group of senior intranet and Internet consultants that provide strategic Internet and intranet consulting, planning and communications services to organizations of all sizes. Our clients include: Amgen, Covidien, CBC, CIBC, HSBC, Liberty Mutual, Manulife Financial, Mastercard, Nintendo, Pepsi, RBC Financial Group, TD, and more than 100 others.  Prescient’s focus includes the assessment, planning, technology selection, content and launch of intranets, websites, and web-based tools. For more information please contact Prescient Digital Media through the website at www.PrescientDigital.com or phone 416.926.8800.


Additional reading


Intranet articles & case studies – www.IntanetBlog.com

Follow us on Twitter – www.Twitter.com/Intanet2

Join the Intranet Global Forum on Facebook – www.Facebook.com/group.php?gid=2723005032

View our presentations on intranets on our SlideShare channel – www.slideshare.net/prescient

Watch Toby discussing the future of intranets – www.YouTube.com/watch?v=kaTMOTpRVQk

Technorati Profile


View Article  Intranet CMSs
How many organizations are using a CMS for their intranet? What about a portal solution?


Respondents to the Intranet 2.0 Global Survey provide (530+ organizations ranging from small to huge, in all corners of the globe: 36% come from the U.S.; 24% from Europe; 60% have more than 1,000 employees; 32% have 6,000 or more employees) some very good insight into the use content management systems (CMSs), as well as portals and Intranet 2.0 tools.


Key findings:

  • Less than 2/3s of organizations use a CMS for their intranet (62%)

  • 24% use a custom built CMS (home grown CMS)

  • 25% use an off-the-shelf solution

  • 11% use a portal solution

  • There is no dominant CMS solution – no one vendor has more than 20% market share

    • Microsoft SharePoint is used by 20% of those that use a CMS

    • Interwoven, Documentum and Vignette each have 4% market share

    • No other solution was cited by more than 8 organizations (2.5% share)


Clearly SharePoint's dominance in the market is showing here. Though only 20% of the respondents are using it as a CMS. For those that have implemented Intranet 2.0 tools, SharePoint (MOSS 2007) is present in 46% of the organizations (though some organizations are using multiple tools including SocialText, Confluence and MediaWiki). In other words, SharePoint is being used as a CMS, but its not its strength which is collaboration sites, document sharing, and portal functionality / features. SharePoint is more often being used for collaboration and portal functionality.


My full presentation on the Intranet 2.0 Global Survey findings is next week at J. Boye – Philadelphia 2009. There are still spots left if you want to register now (and some great case study presentations as well). The full study findings will be sent to survey participants only in mid-May (TBA) followed by a participant only webinar (yes you have to take the survey to get the results).


Speaking of intranets and measurement this is a great free webinar with a terrific case study from PNC Bank: Measuring Intranet Success in the Real World (Case study with PNC Financial Services group) Date: Thursday, 12pm EST – Register Online.


ALSO...


Social Media Webinar for Educators

This webinar is free and designed for university professors, instructors, and students. Topics for discussion include the role of the new media, how the Web is evolving, and what to expect in the future. Best practices and tips for how to engage with others and build trust in a virtual world will also be discussed. Hosted by Plank Center, the one-hour discussion and presentation is on May 1, at 1:30 CDT.


Moderated by Keith Burton, President, InsidEdge, presenters include Robert French, Instructor, PR & Digital Media, Auburn University; Jeff Beringer, SVP, Dialogue/GolinHarris, and Toby Ward, Founder and CEO of Prescient Digital Media.


Technorati Profile


View Article  Intranet 2.0 Global Survey Results
THE SURVEY IS CLOSING & YOUR PARTICIPATION IS REQUIRED -- THE FINDINGS ARE FREE!

500 organizations of all sizes from across the planet have participated and the findings are invaluable - and surprising. If you haven't already done so, please take 8 minutes to take the Intranet 2.0 Global Survey and you’ll get a copy of the full results including the good, bad and learned lessons. Please also direct clients and fellow colleagues. It doesn't cost anything, and I'm not charging anything.

PLEASE TAKE THE SURVEY EVEN IF YOU DO NOT HAVE INTRANET 2.0 TOOLS -- WE REQUIRE BOTH PERSPECTIVES!!

Respondents who complete the survey will be eligible to win $400 (a random email address will be drawn from all responses to the survey). All respondents will also receive a full copy of the results at no cost.

Here's a sneak preview of some of the findings so far:

  • 43% have intranet blogs (10% enterprise deployment); 11% have no plans or interest

  • 47% have intranet wikis (16% enterprise deployment); 10% have no plans or interest

  • 23% have intranet podcasts (6% enterprise deployment); 30% have no plans or interest

  • 17% have intranet social networking (5% enterprise use); 20% have no plans or interest

  • 21% have intranet content tagging (9% enterprise use); 24% have no plans or interest

  • 37% have intranet RSS (12% enterprise use); 12% have no plans or interest

  • 47% have intranet discussion forums (20% enterprise use); 10% have no plans or interest

  • 46% have intranet instant messaging (28% enterprise use); 20% have no plans or interest

  • 8% have intranet mashups (3% enterprise use); 46% have no plans or interest

  • 48% of organizations using SharePoint for Intranet 2.0 tools


A sneak preview of the findings and some of the case study examples will be showcased at J.Boye 09 in Philadelphia (May 5-7, 2009). Register now & receive a fantastic deal on a technology / communications conference of this quality that includes multiple tracks on intranet, SharePoint, content management, user experience and more. J. Boye also features star speakers including the NY Times' David Pogue.

TAKE THE INTRANET 2.0 GLOBAL SURVEY

Technorati Profile


View Article  5 major problems killing Twitter
Twitter earns a lot of praise and recognition for developing one of the most powerful and popular web tools to date. However, its increasingly visible problems are frustrating users and pundits who are demanding satisfaction – or an alternative.


However, Twitter's problems aren't easily fixed. In fact, there are 5 major problems plaguing Twitter:


1- Over capacity – how many times have you tried to access Twitter only to be hit with a jovial cartoon whale that lamely apologizes for denying you of your addiction? Not unlike a bloated whale, Twitter is slowly being beach by over-capacity problems; with more and more users come more demand which is grinding on Twitter's servers and rejecting its fans. And yet, Twitter seems unable to address these demands despite tens of millions of dollars in fresh financing. The problem has forced a bottleneck for users, and some are using it less and pining for alternatives. Fortunately for Twitter, there is no credible alternative with a critical mass to challenge Twitter... yet.


2- Search – I've yet to come across a worse search engine than Twitter's search. Try and find a person by their real name and you will intimately understand this frustration. In fact, Twitter search isn't even good at searching its own user names. I operate a few accounts, and one is called “intranet2.” A search on “intranet” does not uncover this account even though it has more followers than most of the unknown users in its results pages (many of which don't have the word “intranet” in their user name). As for searching for content by keyword... forget about it; it's not worth the aggravation.


3- Crap, crap, crap – its becoming increasingly difficult to filter out the crap, and the fly-by-night Tweet spammers. My favorite of course are the Twitter wanna-be types who follow as many people as they can come across only to quickly unfollow them in an attempt to massage their egos by building a follower base. While Twitter certainly doesn't force me to follow anyone it would be nice to avoid repeated emails from the “internetmarketer” who repeatedly follows and unfollows me (I'm sure he and his partner in the Nigerian Ministry of Finance offer superlative, sage advice). While Twitter does provide a "block" feature, it may take 3 or 4 follow and unfollows before I recognize the need (through all the clutter) to go and block a follower. Furthermore, if Twitter had half a search engine, then I could seek out reasonable and credible Tweeple to follow instead of having to wait for them to find me amongst the swarms of spammers.


4- Antiquated technology – I've been on Twitter for more than a year now (an eternity in the world of demanding social media users) and its almost exactly the same. While Yammer and other services beef-up their technology and functionality, Twitter sits there and does little (or nothing). Not only is the interface overly simplistic despite its use and demand, there have been no upgrades (no discussion threads, no Re-Tweet button, no bookmarking). Nowhere are the technology limitations more noticeable than the problems with security. Hackers have taken notice of Twitter's soft approach to technology and are hammering it with viruses and worms. See Twitter under attack again (VNUnet) and Twitter riddled with worms and scams (again) (Register).


5- No (visible) business model – can we please send some grey hairs over to the Twitter HQ? Please, bring some grown-ups into the office and develop a source of revenue already, or sell it to someone who can. All of the above problems could be overcome or minimalized if it had some revenue to help address these challenges. I really enjoy Twitter, and recognize its enormous power and potential, but I'm going to leave in a heartbeat if an alternative with critical mass presents itself.


Toby Ward is an Internet and intranet consultant who lives, blogs and Tweets from Vancouver, and client locations and conferences all over North America and Europe. He is the founder and CEO of Toronto-based Prescient Digital Media. Follow him at www.Twitter.com/tobyward


Technorati Profile


View Article  5 reasons why Twitter will overtake Facebook
Different platforms, with different approaches, serving different needs... but both are highly viral and are used for social networking. Facebook is the most successful social networking website / platform and, depending on the rankings, the 2nd - 5th most visited website on the planet. Well down the traffic rankings list is Twitter at somewhere around 200th on the list (see Alexa.com for rankings).


However, it incresingly clear that Twitter will one day soon overtake Facebook as the social networking champion for a number of obvious reasons...

1- Connections - Its much easier to add connections (followers) on Twitter. With a click you can see 30 or more followers of any one person and by reading a Tweet or two, determine whether you want to follow them (and often, by custom, they will automatically follow you... opening up exponential connecting opportunities amongst respective followers). Additionally, Tweeps don't have to ask for permission to follow someone, its automatic with no approval process. Typically, Facebook friends know each other in real life... this is not the case on Twitter.

2- Security – Twitter doesn't breed the same security and privacy concerns that are associated with Facebook and the Facebook platform. Tweeps only post one photo, often an icon, or representative image rather than themselves, and a very short bio with a link. Facebook openly encourages you to share as much about yourself as possible and encourages the use of applications that want to grab as much personal information about you as possible.


3- Interface – The Twitter user interface could hardly be easier to use: quick hit posts or micro or mini blogs, a quick glance at other Tweets, and you're out. Facebook is increasingly heavy and cluttered: a myriad of applications, information feeds, photos, ads, etc.... one is left wondering where to look. I have no clue where my “Wall” is anymore, and I now find it stressful to look at Facebook as there's simply too much to digest, and I can no longer do it at a glance.

4- Big brother – Facebook's ownership and management has made conspicuous effort to get tough with its members in recent months. Rather than listen, read or watch what users want, Facebook had decided to do what it wants, in spite of its users. Recently there was the infamous new Terms of Service that implicitly said, “Screw you guys, we'll do what we want with YOUR content.” Follow that up with recent changes to the interface despite massive outcries and user complaints, and Facebook has taken on a reputation of being a bullying 'big brother'... and some members have started deleting their accounts.


5- Applications – There are thousands of Facebook applications, but so many of them serve little or no value, are frequently invasive, if not down right abusive. I have no interest in chomping vampires, finding out “what kind of sandle” I am (are you frickin' kidding me?!), or surrendering my soul for a cheap IQ test, let alone selling all of my personal information for free. Twitter applications are fewer and far-between, but can be tremendously helpful. Tweetdeck is a god-send to Twitter, its founders, and users – it has quadrupled the Twitter experience for highly active Tweeps (ask anyone who uses it). Those that operate multiple Twitter accounts swear by the Twhirl application; and the Tweetpic is now taking Twittersville by storm.


There's another key differentiator: people "join" Facebook, but they "use" Twitter. That's not to say that people don't "use" Facebook, but most are passive members that check the site when they get a note or a friend invite, or once-in-a-while to see what people are doing. Twitter's community however is extraordinarily active -- the average Tweep is on the site several times per day (or using an application that connects to the site). So while Facebook will continue to have a larger membership, Twitter will grow at a faster rate, but will be far more heavily used. Additionally, the mobile use of Tweeps who Tweet from their PDA will begin to skyrocket and far eclipse anything Facebook has ever seen from mobile users.

Facebook is great social networking, but Twitter is more viral, and better used -- it will overtake Facebook someday soon....

--

Toby Ward is an Internet & intranet consultant, writer and speaker, and the Founder of Prescient Digital Media. Feel free to look him up on Facebook or follow him on Twitter @tobyward.

Need help working with or implementing social media? See Prescient Digital Media's Web 2.0 Blueprint.

Technorati Profile

View Article  Mashup the intranet
You've heard of it... but aren't exactly sure what it is. A mashup, far from being a cross between a high-school dance move and the whipped potatoes mama used to make, is typically represented as a single web page that combines or “mashes” together data or content and tools from multiple sources.


Google Maps is an example – it draws all the listings and information from many different sources without having to use an expensive piece of portal technology. These are quite simple to do, and for some represent most of the desired content for integration into a single view or portal.


Even though most don't use or understand mashups (sometimes spelt with the hyphen 'mash-up') , this nascent technology is about to break-out on a corporate intranet near you:


  • mashups will be a $682 million industry in the next 5 years (Forrester)

  • 64% of companies are already adopting mashups or plan to within the next two years (Economist Intelligence Unit)

  • Web mashups, which mix content from publicly available sources, will be the dominant model (80%) for the creation of new enterprise application by 2010 (Gartner, which also cites mashup technology as a top 10 'disrupting' technology over the next 4 years)

  • RSS (the dominant technology delivering data to mashups) has been adopted by 37% of organizations; an additional 53% of organizations plan to or are considering their options for adopting RSS (Intranet 2.0 Global Study)


Mashup technologies can and will disrupt enterprise applications,” says Renat Khasanshyn, author of the Naked Open Source blog and CEO, Altoros Systems, LLC. “During the next three years, mashups will open up a new enterprise application market, providing business users and IT departments with a quick and inexpensive approach to develop and implement applications. And during the decade following 2010, maturing mashup building technologies will shrink the enterprise application market.”


In other words, the mashup provides a light-weight alternative to portals and personalization features (see Alternatives to intranet personalization).

On the corporate intranet, a mashup would typically combine information and data from two to six different sources and might include:

  • a news feed

  • sales figures

  • a widget that displays the most recent comments posted to the CEO blog

  • inventory levels delivered from a back-end database

  • a map pinpointing active client projects


InformIT, republishing an original article in SOA magazine, offer six major characteristics to an enterprise or intranet mashup (see Enterprise Mashups Part I):

  • Collaborative - Mashups are designed to be tagged/searchable/shared with others. User tagging, often called a 'folksonomy', helps users put meaning for themselves and others.

  • Have a face - Mashups usually have a face and the face is a widget. Just like mashups are "micro", so are the applications that front-end them. If the user is the recipient of the mashup, it's only natural for the user to be given a way to interact with the data.

  • Focused on the 'pack' - Mashups are typically created, used, and shared among a small number of related individuals. Knowledge workers collaborate in small packs. Although they may be part of a larger group, they usually function as small teams when it comes to discrete information needs.

  • Time-sensitive - Users need data now. Mashups usually have near real-time delivery requirements. They don't have time to wait for IT to "pre-integrate" data so they can get at it. The Web is real-time and business users have evolved to expect the same inside their enterprises.

  • Non-invasive - There's no need to bring in a whole new set of infrastructure, as enterprise mashups run inside the current enterprise stack. This includes both mashup sources (databases, SOA services, etc.) and mashup destinations (portals, blogs, wikis, email, spreadsheets, etc.).

  • Limited cleansing - The amount of data cleansing and normalization needed should be comparable to the amount of cleansing and normalization a user does in Excel. If there's more, you have a bigger problem that should be addressed concurrently with your mashup initiative.


Have you considered intranet mashups? Are you using a portal for intranet home page customization / personalization? Have you considered RSS? Continue the discussion on the Intranet Global Forum (Facebook community).


Wondering how to use mashups and other 2.0 technology on the corporate intranet? Have a look at the Intranet 2.0 Blueprint.

Technorati Profile

 

Search
    follow me on Twitter