Social media and intranet case studies, best practices, & evolution by Toby Ward.
View Article  More pay for intranet managers

Gerry McGovern says that you will earn more money if you start proving the value of the intranet. Sounds like something I would say (yeah, I know, a broken record).

 

Gerry is a firm believer “if you are in charge of your company's intranet you are in pole position to further your career.”

 

The bottom line: the vast majority of executives think the intranet delivers little value for the cost – and some believe it’s a waste of money. But most of these suits aren’t ignorant fools, they’re just ignorant. They need a sheppard to show them the way – to show them the money (see Measure your efforts).

 

Watch the vlog-like video clip Intranet Task Master with Gerry talking about the value of intranet measurement.

 

  Digg this         Post to del.icio.us       Post to Slashdot   
 

  Add to Technorati Faves

Technorati Profile

View Article  If we write do we not blog?

“If you prick us do we not bleed?” lamented Shylock (most recently portrayed, and brilliantly played by the great Al Pacino) in The Merchant of Venice. The answer is as certain as George W. mangling his syntax in a press conference on foreign affairs. But the answer confounds many communications managers who still wrestle with the question of whether to blog (or not).

 

A recent study by Bain & Company involving 1200 executives throughout the world (see Management Tools & Trends 2007 study) reveals that 30% of those companies (a cross-section of small, medium and large companies) use blogs. Those same executives report an underwhelming rate of satisfaction with their blogs of only 3.39 out of 5.

 

Clearly, more companies are blogging, but with mixed results, and causing many more to think about it, but wonder if they should or not. Huh?! Yes, some are as confused as Dick Cheney on a hunting trip.

 

 

Read my full article If we write do we not blog? (Content Matters).

View Article  Owning Knowledge Management

Is Knowledge Management (KM) dying? Was it just a fleeting fad? I had to pause for a second when I read Dave Pollard’s Knowledge Management: Finding Quick Wins and Long Term Value because I hadn’t read anything about KM in quite a while.

 

It was a buzz word for many years that hasn’t generated much buzz as of late. I’ve not heard a client nor any conference attendee nor read anyone posting a question to this blog or e-mail me anything on the subject in at least 18 months. A quick search on Google News finds only a handful of stories in the past week. But one such tidbit caught my eye and perhaps provides a hint that KM is heating-up again: According to Bain & Company's Management Tools & Trends 2007 study, KM, for the first time, ranks among the top-10 "most used" tools.

 

 

For the record, the top 10 tools cited by executives (a survey of 1200 executives from around the World):

 

  1. Strategic planning
  2. Customer relationship management
  3. Customer segmentation
  4. Benchmarking
  5. Core competencies
  6. Mission & vision statements
  7. Outsourcing
  8. Knowledge management
  9. Business process reengineering (tied for 8th)
  10. Scenario & contingency planning (tied for 8th)

For those keeping score, KM isn’t just a tool though. In fact, it’s not a tool at all. KM is a business discipline built around people and process, and supported by technology. And there are many tools in the field of KM (see The lost meaning of knowledge management, written almost a year ago to the day, for a full definition and overview of KM).

 

However, viewed as a tool in the context that Bain uses, KM is increasingly important. Not surprisingly though is this telling statistic: in the top 25 most used tools, KM is the least satisfactory off all the tools (save for RFID which narrowly beat out KM for least satisfactory). In other words, the biggest gap between importance and satisfaction is awarded to KM.

 

In short, effective KM requires cultural adoption and change management with strong, well defined practices for sharing knowledge, and multiple supporting technologies (including intranet, document management, collaborative tools, etc.).

 

In Knowledge Management: Finding Quick Wins and Long Term Value Dave Pollard offers up six quick wins for KM:

 

  1. Create focused, managed directories of acknowledge experts in subjects that matter to a lot of people in your organization.
  2. Provide employees with a desktop search tool and show them how to use it effectively.
  3. Provide 'cheat sheets' to users that show how to organize (and name) documents on your hard drive and messages in e-mail folders.
  4. Use RSS and encourage people to publish their information on blogs.
  5. Create a template for requesting information that is needed in a hurry where the requestor isn't sure who to ask for it (via e-mail, IM or other routing system).
  6. Teach people how to do research, not just search: This skill isn't just for information professionals.

Clearly KM is important – and very important to executives. And yet intranet managers don’t seem to be doing much about it…

 

(Just an interesting side note from the study: 30% of companies use blogs, with a satisfaction rate of 3.39 out of 5.)

  Digg this         Post to del.icio.us       Post to Slashdot   
 

  Add to Technorati Faves

Technorati Profile

Search
    follow me on Twitter