Social media and intranet case studies, best practices, & evolution by Toby Ward.
View Article  Star Wars creator praises Scotland’s schools intranet

The force is with Scotland’s schools intranet, literally. I really had to read this story twice to believe it, and didn’t know whether to laugh or to re-read it a third time. Direct from the Times Online, I’ve really nothing to add to make this more amusing… or curious: The force is with Scotland's schools intranet, says George Lucas.

“It seemed the most unlikely of joint-billings - the Star Wars director George Lucas and a modest Scots initiative to improve e-communication within schools.

 

In what must rank as one of the most heady compliments ever given to an education system, the film maker announced to members of the US House of Representatives that America should adopt Scotland's pioneering school websites as a way to improve pupil access to technology.

 

May the force, indeed, be with Glow, a scheme which sets up chatrooms and shared resources for pupils and is being held up as a shining international example of how ICT can help teaching and learning.

 

Mr Lucas, who heads his own not-for-profit education foundation and is on the quest for what he calls “edutopia”, told representatives on the telecommunications and internet sub-committee that the US is lagging behind Scotland in using 21st century tools to teach its children.

 

He said: “This year we describe a project from Scotland called Glow, the first national schools intranet, which provides every Scottish school with a common e-platform for student and teacher e-mail, for parents to have regular communication with their schools, for publishing school websites and for features such as online course and videoconferencing between schools.

 

“This kind of common platform makes perfect sense. As companies and government agencies do, school districts and states should invest in ensuring that each of their locations has the same suite of online tools for their work and communications.

“But school districts and states have been slow to invest at the level the Scottish government has done for its schools. For a nation of five million people, the system cost $75 million and took four years to develop.”

 

Glow, which is run by the organisation Learning and Teaching Scotland (LTS), with £37.5 million funding from the government, is credited with revolutionising e-teaching in Scottish schools.The network could eventually see around 800,000 pupils, teachers, parents and education professionals from all 32 Scottish local authorities linked together.

 

By all accounts, this is a very intriguing and worth program. And I salute Lucas for citing and promoting the program. In fact, I truly believe that there is no more worth cause in the Western World than children’s programs, particularly those that focus on education."

But, Glow? The force is with “Glow”?

 

Notwithstanding all the potential jokes and puns (I’m trying hard to refrain), I would like to know more about Glow if anyone has a decent case study to share?

 

BOOKMARK THIS:

 Digg this     Post to del.icio.us     Post to Slashdot     reddit     

Facebook     StumbleUpon    Add to Technorati Faves

 

 

 

View Article  Social software that power Intranet 2.0

“Looking for greater flexibility and support for more ad hoc processes, employees have responded with a more bottom-up approach, in some cases circumventing official information systems,” say CMS Watch Founder Tony Byrne and contributing analyst Jarod Gingras, the principal authors of The Enterprise Social Software Report 2008.

 

 

CMS Watch's social media vendors matrix.

 

In other words, if your organization hasn’t embraced and standardized social software, your employees will begin installing it and using it without your permission. I know of what client that only found out recently that 15% of their employee base had voluntarily joined a dedicated company Facebook site. At BT, 4,000 employees formed their own “BT Facebook” site. BT took note and in response built their own social networking site called MyBT (see The power of Intranet 2.0).

 

If your organization hasn’t already developed an Intranet 2.0 plan (social media plan), you would do well to develop one before employees develop their own. This plan ideally contains the business case for moving to Intranet 2.0. Byrne and Gingras cite a number of business benefits to implementing enterprise social software:

 

Hard benefits:

 

  • Reduce expenses
  • Increase productivity
  • Increase customer retention

Soft benefits:

 

  • Improve internal communication
  • Improve internal collaboration
  • Improve employee morale and retention

I cited a number of positive ROI examples, or link to others, in Intranet 2.0: A must-have.

 

While a plan is a must, an even more difficult task may be the selection of the actual software that will power your Intranet 2.0 – there are now hundreds of solutions on the market. The Enterprise Social Software Report dissects the capabilities of 20 different social software (social media) solutions for Intranet 2.0 (or Web 2.0) including those from:

 

  • IBM (Lotus Connections)
  • SharePoint
  • Connectbeam
  • Facebook
  • Google (Blogger)
  • MediaWiki
  • Socialtext
  • and others

Each of these solutions are reviewed for their business service uses including:

 

  • Blog
  • Wiki
  • Social Ranking
  • Project Tracking & Participation
  • Multimedia
  • Info Filtering
  • File Sharing
  • Web Conferencing
  • Discussion Forums
  • Presence / Instant Messaging (IM)
  • People Finding (e.g. social networking)

All of this is rated according to various Administration & System Services (e.g. security, analytics, etc.) and various corporate scenarios (e.g. Enterprise Collaboration, Project Collaboration, etc.).

 

Some interesting notes regarding the two big solutions, SharePoint and Lotus Connections / Quickr:

 

  • Lotus Connections / Quickr: strong social networking, strong presence and IM tools, excellent integration with Notes and emerging Outlook connectors, and an innovative Blackberry application; “underwhelming blog/wiki” and requires WebSphere Portal for roles and group modules – best for Enterprise Networking; poor for Project Collaboration.
  • Microsoft SharePoint (MOSS 2007): broad range of third-party plug-ins, lightweight portal services including bundled applications and lightweight document and records management services into social applications, search works well in an all-SharePoint environment; almost all native services are weak compared to competitors, near complete absence of social networking, social tagging & Bookmarking, and surprisingly weak integration with Outlook – best for Project Collaboration (e.g. team sites); poor for Enterprise deployments.

In short, Lotus is a better enterprise solution; SharePoint is a better project or team solution.

 

Regardless, 20 different products are reviewed in detail (from 10 – 25 pages per product review) and it’s a worthwhile read if you are looking at implementing social media or Intranet 2.0 software. Buy CMS Watch’s Enterprise Social Media Report 2008 (they offer a 30-day, 100% money-back guarantee).

 

If you’re looking to move to Intranet 2.0, but don’t exactly know how, then have a look at our Intranet 2.0 Blueprint service, or call me at 416.986.2226.

 

ADDITIONAL READING:

Intranet 2.0: A must-have

Enterprise 2.0 vs. Intranet 2.0

Embracing Enterprise 2.0

 

BOOKMARK THIS:

 Digg this     Post to del.icio.us     Post to Slashdot     reddit     

Facebook     StumbleUpon    Add to Technorati Faves

 
Search
    follow me on Twitter